<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bad Connection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cecily.info/2010/01/09/a-bad-connection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cecily.info/2010/01/09/a-bad-connection/</link>
	<description>they see me shushin&#039;, they hatin&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecily Walker</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2010/01/09/a-bad-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecily Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=2410#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a common complaint, but what makes social media different (IMO) is the sense of intimacy. I think it&#039;s a false sense of intimacy. I recently read a piece in The Chronicle of Higher Education about friendship in the age of social media, and the line that stuck with me most was &quot;if we&#039;re friends with everybody, how can we be friends with anybody?&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Social media amplifies the sense of alienation for me because it is so easy to broadcast to a wider audience. Unlike writing a blog, when you post something on Twitter, Facebook, or Friendfeed, people have opted-in to receive your updates. Because they&#039;ve opted in, I&#039;m left with the idea that people &quot;like&quot; me, or at the very least they think I&#039;m interesting. It makes me think that people are more invested in the exchange than they actually are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s a common complaint, but what makes social media different (IMO) is the sense of intimacy. I think it&#39;s a false sense of intimacy. I recently read a piece in The Chronicle of Higher Education about friendship in the age of social media, and the line that stuck with me most was &#8220;if we&#39;re friends with everybody, how can we be friends with anybody?&#8221; </p>
<p>Social media amplifies the sense of alienation for me because it is so easy to broadcast to a wider audience. Unlike writing a blog, when you post something on Twitter, Facebook, or Friendfeed, people have opted-in to receive your updates. Because they&#39;ve opted in, I&#39;m left with the idea that people &#8220;like&#8221; me, or at the very least they think I&#39;m interesting. It makes me think that people are more invested in the exchange than they actually are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica M</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2010/01/09/a-bad-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=2410#comment-475</guid>
		<description>That Asperger&#039;s analogy is apt. I like it. I&#039;ll probably use it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t difficulty in understanding intent and the lack of access to communication modes beyond the words themselves a common complaint with any form of electronic communication (which probably started even before email became ubiquitous)? Does social media just magnify that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Asperger&#39;s analogy is apt. I like it. I&#39;ll probably use it.</p>
<p>Isn&#39;t difficulty in understanding intent and the lack of access to communication modes beyond the words themselves a common complaint with any form of electronic communication (which probably started even before email became ubiquitous)? Does social media just magnify that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porcupines, Schopenhauer, and Intimacy — cecily walker</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2010/01/09/a-bad-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Porcupines, Schopenhauer, and Intimacy — cecily walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=2410#comment-474</guid>
		<description>[...] Related to my previous post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related to my previous post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

