<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Queer Women Monetizing the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/</link>
	<description>they see me shushin&#039;, they hatin&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Femmeflame</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Femmeflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I was in the audience.
Some of us were quite clear that we didn&#039;t think Interactive Male was doing the community any favours in any large enough way to make it special. I personally found it laughable the concept that it was responsible for Black men getting together in the Twin Cities area.

If I understand correctly it is just a finger on a corporate hand that ain&#039;t all about queer love and community.

Butch-Femme.com  has been struggling for a very long time. Last year it almost went under. I would not put it in the money-maker catagory but for sure it&#039;s a part of the longeveity gallery. I was a part of of it for many yeats starting in 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the audience.<br />
Some of us were quite clear that we didn&#039;t think Interactive Male was doing the community any favours in any large enough way to make it special. I personally found it laughable the concept that it was responsible for Black men getting together in the Twin Cities area.</p>
<p>If I understand correctly it is just a finger on a corporate hand that ain&#039;t all about queer love and community.</p>
<p>Butch-Femme.com  has been struggling for a very long time. Last year it almost went under. I would not put it in the money-maker catagory but for sure it&#039;s a part of the longeveity gallery. I was a part of of it for many yeats starting in 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Femmeflame</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Femmeflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-822</guid>
		<description>I was in the audience.
Some of us were quite clear that we didn&#039;t think Interactive Male was doing the community any favours in any large enough way to make it special. I personally found it laughable the concept that it was responsible for Black men getting together in the Twin Cities area.

If I understand correctly it is just a finger on a corporate hand that ain&#039;t all about queer love and community.

Butch-Femme.com  has been struggling for a very long time. Last year it almost went under. I would not put it in the money-maker catagory but for sure it&#039;s a part of the longeveity gallery. I was a part of of it for many yeats starting in 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the audience.<br />
Some of us were quite clear that we didn&#039;t think Interactive Male was doing the community any favours in any large enough way to make it special. I personally found it laughable the concept that it was responsible for Black men getting together in the Twin Cities area.</p>
<p>If I understand correctly it is just a finger on a corporate hand that ain&#039;t all about queer love and community.</p>
<p>Butch-Femme.com  has been struggling for a very long time. Last year it almost went under. I would not put it in the money-maker catagory but for sure it&#039;s a part of the longeveity gallery. I was a part of of it for many yeats starting in 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, you&#039;re right about the Logo ownership. They weren&#039;t originally, though. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AfterEllen.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Wikipedia says&lt;/a&gt; Sarah Warn started it in 2002, and Logo bought it in 2006. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(TV_channel)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Wikipedia also says&lt;/a&gt; that the Logo EVP and GM is a woman (Lisa Sherman). But  Logo is owned by Viacom so you know what that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, you&#039;re right about the Logo ownership. They weren&#039;t originally, though. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AfterEllen.com" target="_blank">Wikipedia says</a> Sarah Warn started it in 2002, and Logo bought it in 2006. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(TV_channel)" target="_blank">Wikipedia also says</a> that the Logo EVP and GM is a woman (Lisa Sherman). But  Logo is owned by Viacom so you know what that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica M</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, you&#039;re right about the Logo ownership. They weren&#039;t originally, though. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AfterEllen.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia says&lt;/a&gt; Sarah Warn started it in 2002, and Logo bought it in 2006. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(TV_channel)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia also says&lt;/a&gt; that the Logo EVP and GM is a woman (Lisa Sherman). But  Logo is owned by Viacom so you know what that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, you&#039;re right about the Logo ownership. They weren&#039;t originally, though. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AfterEllen.com" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia says</a> Sarah Warn started it in 2002, and Logo bought it in 2006. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(TV_channel)" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia also says</a> that the Logo EVP and GM is a woman (Lisa Sherman). But  Logo is owned by Viacom so you know what that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecily</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>cecily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-148</guid>
		<description>But aren&#039;t they owned by Logo? Is Logo owned by queer women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But aren&#39;t they owned by Logo? Is Logo owned by queer women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecily Walker</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecily Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-823</guid>
		<description>But aren&#039;t they owned by Logo? Is Logo owned by queer women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But aren&#039;t they owned by Logo? Is Logo owned by queer women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-149</guid>
		<description>AfterEllen?

I think it&#039;s really more a woman thing more than it&#039;s a queer thing, but I think the double minority may make folks even more hesitant about the perception of taking advantage of people whom you are trying to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AfterEllen?</p>
<p>I think it&#039;s really more a woman thing more than it&#039;s a queer thing, but I think the double minority may make folks even more hesitant about the perception of taking advantage of people whom you are trying to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica M</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-824</guid>
		<description>AfterEllen?

I think it&#039;s really more a woman thing more than it&#039;s a queer thing, but I think the double minority may make folks even more hesitant about the perception of taking advantage of people whom you are trying to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AfterEllen?</p>
<p>I think it&#039;s really more a woman thing more than it&#039;s a queer thing, but I think the double minority may make folks even more hesitant about the perception of taking advantage of people whom you are trying to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecily</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>cecily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, AJ. I&#039;d thought about ButchFemme.com after the discussion I had on Saturday, but wasn&#039;t sure how well they were doing/if they were charging money (I hadn&#039;t stopped by there in a long time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, AJ. I&#039;d thought about ButchFemme.com after the discussion I had on Saturday, but wasn&#039;t sure how well they were doing/if they were charging money (I hadn&#039;t stopped by there in a long time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecily Walker</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/25/queer-women-monetizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecily Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1568#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, AJ. I&#039;d thought about ButchFemme.com after the discussion I had on Saturday, but wasn&#039;t sure how well they were doing/if they were charging money (I hadn&#039;t stopped by there in a long time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, AJ. I&#039;d thought about ButchFemme.com after the discussion I had on Saturday, but wasn&#039;t sure how well they were doing/if they were charging money (I hadn&#039;t stopped by there in a long time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

