<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On whuffie, social capital, and social climbing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cecily.info/2008/08/10/on-whuffie-social-capital-and-social-climbing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/10/on-whuffie-social-capital-and-social-climbing/</link>
	<description>an intermittent record of my personal and professional interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: grabbingsand</title>
		<link>http://cecily.info/2008/08/10/on-whuffie-social-capital-and-social-climbing/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>grabbingsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cecily.info/?p=1558#comment-144</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s surprising that so few others make this very salient point.
Originally, I thought my distaste for the whuffie concept was rooted in a kind of overall BoingBoing-fatigue, back when Doctorow was publishing a new novel every other week and every hip and cool thing was being &quot;discovered&quot; by Xeni and company -- almost always two or three weeks too late.
But now, as the whuffie concept has floated out and away from its originator, I&#039;m watching the word split in meaning.  On the one hand, it can be a way of expressing concern or offering encouragement in an Internet-acceptable way.  A scan of Metachat (Metafilter&#039;s sidecar social blog) will give you several such examples.  But on the other hand, you&#039;re absolutely right.  For many, this mutual encouragement is becoming less altruistic and more assumptively and promotionally symbiotic.  In those cases, the word &quot;whuffie&quot; is substituted for what the world has always known as an &quot;old boy&#039;s network.&quot;
So what is the solution?  How do you spread the gospel that building a community for the sake of bettering a community is worthwhile?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s surprising that so few others make this very salient point.<br />
Originally, I thought my distaste for the whuffie concept was rooted in a kind of overall BoingBoing-fatigue, back when Doctorow was publishing a new novel every other week and every hip and cool thing was being &quot;discovered&quot; by Xeni and company &#8212; almost always two or three weeks too late.<br />
But now, as the whuffie concept has floated out and away from its originator, I&#039;m watching the word split in meaning.  On the one hand, it can be a way of expressing concern or offering encouragement in an Internet-acceptable way.  A scan of Metachat (Metafilter&#039;s sidecar social blog) will give you several such examples.  But on the other hand, you&#039;re absolutely right.  For many, this mutual encouragement is becoming less altruistic and more assumptively and promotionally symbiotic.  In those cases, the word &quot;whuffie&quot; is substituted for what the world has always known as an &quot;old boy&#039;s network.&quot;<br />
So what is the solution?  How do you spread the gospel that building a community for the sake of bettering a community is worthwhile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
